Featured image of post Rust-Memory Safety Without Garbage Collection???

Rust-Memory Safety Without Garbage Collection???

What MADNESS is this? THIS IS SPARTA!!!!!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/300_(film)

Rust’s Memory Safety Without Garbage Collection

One of Rust’s most revolutionary features is memory safety without garbage collection (GC).
(wha??? )

While most modern languages rely on garbage collection to manage memory automatically (looking at you, Java and Go), Rust takes a different approach.

It ensures memory safety at compile time through ownership, borrowing, and lifetimes.

(huh?)

(Yeah.. it was weird to me too…)

Why Does Memory Safety Matter?

In languages like C and C++, memory management is manual, which leads to:

  • Segmentation faults – accessing invalid memory locations.
  • Dangling pointers – pointing to memory that has been freed.
  • Use-after-free errors – using memory after it has been deallocated.
  • Memory leaks – forgetting to free memory, leading to wasted resources.
  • Data races – multiple threads accessing shared memory without proper synchronization.

Rust eliminates these issues at compile time.

SO theoretically , that means no runtime surprises, no silent memory corruption, and no need for a garbage collector..

This definitely sounds like madness…

Or is it?


Rust’s Secret Sauce: Ownership, Borrowing, and Lifetimes

Rust guarantees memory safety without a GC using three core concepts:

1. Ownership

Ownership is Rust’s way of ensuring safe and deterministic memory management. The key rules are:

  1. Each value in Rust has a single owner.
  2. When the owner goes out of scope, Rust automatically deallocates the value.
  3. Ownership can be transferred (moved) but not duplicated (without explicit cloning).

Example: Ownership in Action

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
fn main() {
    let s = String::from("Hello, Rust!"); // s owns the String
    take_ownership(s);
    // println!("{}", s); // ERROR: s has been moved!
}

fn take_ownership(some_string: String) {
    println!("{}", some_string); // some_string now owns the value
} // some_string is dropped here

Here, s’s ownership is moved into take_ownership, so it cannot be used afterward. No dangling pointers!


2. Borrowing

Sometimes, you want to use a value without taking ownership. This is where borrowing comes in.

  • Immutable borrows (&T) – multiple readers, no writers.
  • Mutable borrows (&mut T) – only one writer, no simultaneous readers.

Example: Borrowing in Action

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
fn main() {
    let s = String::from("Rust");
    print_length(&s); // Borrowing s
    println!("String after borrowing: {}", s); // Still valid!
}

fn print_length(s: &String) {
    println!("The length of '{}' is {}.", s, s.len());
}

Here, print_length borrows s instead of taking ownership. That means s remains valid in main!


3. Lifetimes

Lifetimes prevent dangling references by ensuring all references are valid for as long as they’re needed (but no longer!).

Rust automatically infers lifetimes most of the time, but explicit lifetimes ('a) may be needed in complex cases.

Example: Lifetime Annotation

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
fn longest<'a>(s1: &'a str, s2: &'a str) -> &'a str {
    if s1.len() > s2.len() { s1 } else { s2 }
}

fn main() {
    let string1 = String::from("Hello");
    let string2 = "Rust";
    let result = longest(&string1, &string2);
    println!("Longest string: {}", result);
}

Here, 'a ensures the returned reference lives as long as both inputs.


Is Rust Safer than C and C++?

FeatureRustC / C++
Null PointersNo nulls allowed (Option<T>)Dereferencing null causes crashes
Data RacesPrevented at compile timePossible, hard to debug
SegfaultsImpossible (unless unsafe)Very common
Use-After-FreeCompile-time errorCommon cause of crashes
Memory LeaksAvoided via ownershipManual cleanup required
According to that dandy table.. it is..

Summary: Rust

Rust is the only major systems programming language that guarantees memory safety at compile time without relying on garbage collection.

Faster than GC-based languages like Java, Go, and Python.
Safer than C and C++, eliminating entire classes of bugs.
More predictable with zero-cost abstractions.