Featured image of post OpenApi Round Up-Obsidian + Hugo vs TinaCMS vs GitBook for Docs

OpenApi Round Up-Obsidian + Hugo vs TinaCMS vs GitBook for Docs


1. Obsidian + Hugo for OpenAPI Documentation

πŸ”₯ Pros

βœ… Markdown-based – If you’re already using Obsidian, you can write and manage your API docs locally.

βœ… Static site speed – Hugo generates lightning-fast sites, perfect for OpenAPI docs with large JSON files.

βœ… Version Control – Git manages all changes, making it easy to track updates and rollback if needed.

βœ… Customizable – Hugo’s themes and templates let you design fully tailored API documentation.

βœ… Free & Self-hosted – No recurring costs or vendor lock-in.

⚠️ Cons

❌ Setup Required – You need to configure Hugo, themes, and deployment (Netlify, GitHub Pages, etc.).

❌ No Live Editing – Unlike CMS tools, you don’t get an instant visual preview.


2. TinaCMS for OpenAPI Documentation

πŸ”₯ Pros

βœ… Real-time Editing – A live Markdown editor directly in your browser.

βœ… Git-backed – Changes are stored in Git, making it great for team collaboration.

βœ… Headless CMS – You can pair TinaCMS with Next.js, Hugo, or other frameworks.

βœ… Easy UI – Perfect for non-technical users who still need to update API documentation.

⚠️ Cons

❌ Limited OpenAPI Support – Unlike Hugo or GitBook, TinaCMS doesn’t have built-in OpenAPI renderers.

❌ Complex Setup – Requires integrating TinaCMS with an existing static site framework.

❌ Not Fully Static – While Git-backed, it still relies on a CMS-style UI.


3. GitBook for OpenAPI Documentation

πŸ”₯ Pros

βœ… Easy Setup – Just sign up and start writing; GitBook is built for documentation.

βœ… Great UI/UX – A clean, intuitive interface with built-in navigation, search, and theming.

βœ… Live Collaboration – Multiple people can edit docs simultaneously, like Google Docs.

βœ… Automatic API Integration – Supports OpenAPI specs and has built-in API documentation templates.

⚠️ Cons

❌ Not Fully Customizable – You’re stuck with GitBook’s themes and structure.

❌ Paid Plans – While there’s a free tier, advanced features require a subscription.

❌ Vendor Lock-in – Moving your documentation to another system is not as easy as exporting Markdown.


Feature Comparison Table

FeatureObsidian + HugoTinaCMSGitBook
Markdown Supportβœ… Full Controlβœ… Git-backedβœ… Native Markdown
Customization🎨 Full Control🎨 Requires Custom Integration🚫 Limited
OpenAPI Supportβœ… OpenAPI + Hugo Plugins❌ Manual Formattingβœ… Built-in OpenAPI Docs
Ease of UseπŸ›  Requires Setupβœ… Live Editingβœ… Easiest
Collaborationβœ… Git-basedβœ… Git-basedβœ… Real-time
Self-Hostingβœ… Yesβœ… Yes🚫 No
CostπŸ†“ FreeπŸ†“ FreeπŸ’° Paid Plans

Which One Should You Choose?

  • If you want full control and speed: βœ… Obsidian + Hugo
  • If you need an easy live editor with Git: βœ… TinaCMS
  • If you want a hosted, all-in-one solution: βœ… GitBook