1. Obsidian + Hugo for OpenAPI Documentation
π₯ Pros
β Markdown-based β If you’re already using Obsidian, you can write and manage your API docs locally.
β Static site speed β Hugo generates lightning-fast sites, perfect for OpenAPI docs with large JSON files.
β Version Control β Git manages all changes, making it easy to track updates and rollback if needed.
β Customizable β Hugo’s themes and templates let you design fully tailored API documentation.
β Free & Self-hosted β No recurring costs or vendor lock-in.
β οΈ Cons
β Setup Required β You need to configure Hugo, themes, and deployment (Netlify, GitHub Pages, etc.).
β No Live Editing β Unlike CMS tools, you don’t get an instant visual preview.
2. TinaCMS for OpenAPI Documentation
π₯ Pros
β Real-time Editing β A live Markdown editor directly in your browser.
β Git-backed β Changes are stored in Git, making it great for team collaboration.
β Headless CMS β You can pair TinaCMS with Next.js, Hugo, or other frameworks.
β Easy UI β Perfect for non-technical users who still need to update API documentation.
β οΈ Cons
β Limited OpenAPI Support β Unlike Hugo or GitBook, TinaCMS doesnβt have built-in OpenAPI renderers.
β Complex Setup β Requires integrating TinaCMS with an existing static site framework.
β Not Fully Static β While Git-backed, it still relies on a CMS-style UI.
3. GitBook for OpenAPI Documentation
π₯ Pros
β Easy Setup β Just sign up and start writing; GitBook is built for documentation.
β Great UI/UX β A clean, intuitive interface with built-in navigation, search, and theming.
β Live Collaboration β Multiple people can edit docs simultaneously, like Google Docs.
β Automatic API Integration β Supports OpenAPI specs and has built-in API documentation templates.
β οΈ Cons
β Not Fully Customizable β You’re stuck with GitBook’s themes and structure.
β Paid Plans β While there’s a free tier, advanced features require a subscription.
β Vendor Lock-in β Moving your documentation to another system is not as easy as exporting Markdown.
Feature Comparison Table
Feature | Obsidian + Hugo | TinaCMS | GitBook |
---|---|---|---|
Markdown Support | β Full Control | β Git-backed | β Native Markdown |
Customization | π¨ Full Control | π¨ Requires Custom Integration | π« Limited |
OpenAPI Support | β OpenAPI + Hugo Plugins | β Manual Formatting | β Built-in OpenAPI Docs |
Ease of Use | π Requires Setup | β Live Editing | β Easiest |
Collaboration | β Git-based | β Git-based | β Real-time |
Self-Hosting | β Yes | β Yes | π« No |
Cost | π Free | π Free | π° Paid Plans |
Which One Should You Choose?
- If you want full control and speed: β Obsidian + Hugo
- If you need an easy live editor with Git: β TinaCMS
- If you want a hosted, all-in-one solution: β GitBook