Swimmers in crowded China pool

Handling Rate Limiting When Large User Pools or Countries Are Behind a Firewall

Rate limiting is a crucial defense mechanism against DDoS attacks, API abuse, and server overloads. But what happens when millions of legitimate users—such as an entire country, university, or corporate network—are behind a shared IP due to a firewall or NAT (Network Address Translation)?

By the end of this guide, you’ll understand:
✅ Why rate limiting becomes a problem when large user pools share a single IP
✅ How traditional rate limiting fails in these cases
✅ Advanced strategies to handle large-scale users without blocking legitimate traffic
✅ How to configure smart rate limiting in Kubernetes, NGINX, and API Gateways

Let’s dive into the real-world challenges and solutions for modern cloud environments! 🚀

1. The Challenge: When Many Users Share a Single IP

Why does this happen? Many corporate offices, universities, and entire countries route traffic through a few public IPs, usually because of:

🔹 Enterprise firewalls – All employees share a single external IP.
🔹 University networks – Thousands of students access the web from one egress IP.
🔹 Country-wide NAT (CGNAT) – ISPs use Carrier-Grade NAT (CGNAT) to reduce IPv4 exhaustion.
🔹 Mobile networks – Cellular providers route all user traffic through a small number of public IPs.

🚨 The Problem: If your API rate limits based on IP, you might accidentally block thousands of legitimate users from the same organization or country!

Example:

• An API allows 100 requests per minute per IP.
• A university with 5,000 students tries to access your service.
• Only the first 100 users succeed. The rest get blocked!

This is why traditional rate limiting fails in such cases.

2. Why Traditional Rate Limiting Fails

2.1 How Standard Rate Limiting Works

Most APIs implement IP-based rate limiting using a fixed window or token bucket algorithm.

Example NGINX rate limit configuration:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
  name: my-api-ingress
  annotations:
    nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/limit-req-zone: "$binary_remote_addr zone=api_limit:10m rate=10r/s"
    nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/limit-req-burst: "20"

🚨 Why this fails:

• If 10,000 users share a single IP, this rule blocks 99% of legitimate traffic.
• Large user pools behind a firewall get throttled unfairly.

We need smarter solutions.

3. Smart Rate Limiting Strategies for Large User Pools

To prevent accidental mass blocking, we must use advanced rate limiting techniques:

✅ 3.1 Rate Limit by API Key or User ID Instead of IP

Instead of limiting by IP, limit based on API keys, session tokens, or user IDs.

Example: Configuring User-Based Rate Limits in NGINX

Modify your NGINX configuration to rate limit based on API keys instead of IPs:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

apiVersion: networking.k8s.io/v1
kind: Ingress
metadata:
  name: my-api-ingress
  annotations:
    nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/limit-req-zone: "$http_x_api_key zone=api_limit:10m rate=100r/s"
    nginx.ingress.kubernetes.io/limit-req-burst: "50"

🔹 Why this works:

• Instead of blocking based on IP, each unique API key gets its own rate limit.
• Multiple users behind one firewall can still access your API fairly.

✅ 3.2 Use a Sliding Window Algorithm Instead of Fixed Windows

Instead of blocking all users at once, use a sliding window to allow fair distribution.

Example: Implementing Sliding Window in Istio

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15

apiVersion: security.istio.io/v1beta1
kind: RequestAuthentication
metadata:
  name: rate-limit-policy
spec:
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: my-api
  rules:
  - match:
      prefix: /
    quota:
      maxTokens: 100  
      refillRate: 10   
      windowSize: "sliding"

🔹 Why this works:

• A sliding window prevents hard cutoffs.
• Users share the rate limit fairly instead of hitting a brick wall.

✅ 3.3 Use Advanced Rate Limiting with Cloud API Gateways

Many cloud API gateways provide built-in advanced rate limiting.

Example: AWS API Gateway Rate Limiting per User Token

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

{
  "rateLimit": {
    "limit": 500,
    "burst": 100,
    "keyType": "API_KEY"
  }
}

🔹 Why this works:

• AWS dynamically adjusts limits based on traffic patterns.
• Limits apply per user, not per shared IP.

✅ 3.4 Use Device Fingerprinting Instead of IP Address

Some services use device fingerprinting to assign unique identifiers per user session.

🔹 How it works:

• Track browser headers, cookies, and session tokens.
• Identify users uniquely, even if they share an IP.
• Rate limit based on unique devices, not just IPs.

This is useful for public Wi-Fi networks, mobile carriers, and large ISPs.

✅ 3.5 Implement Fair Queueing for Large User Pools

Instead of blocking excess requests, queue them and process fairly.

Example: Using Cloudflare Waiting Room to Handle Large User Traffic

• When an API gets overloaded, users join a queue instead of getting blocked.
• Traffic is served fairly based on priority rules.
• Prevents IP bans while still protecting backend resources.

4. Final Thoughts: The Key Takeaways

🔹 Traditional IP-based rate limiting fails when large user pools share an IP.
🔹 Modern solutions use API keys, user IDs, and sliding windows to distribute limits fairly.
🔹 Cloud providers offer advanced rate limiting tools that dynamically adjust traffic.
🔹 Device fingerprinting and fair queuing prevent accidental mass blocking.
🔹 Implementing these strategies ensures that legitimate users can access your API without disruption.

As cloud applications scale globally, handling rate limiting fairly is more important than ever. 🚀

Reference Links

• Rate Limiting - Wikipedia
• AWS API Gateway Throttling
• Google Cloud Endpoints Rate Limiting
• Azure API Management Throttling