Git Submodules vs. Git Subtrees
Git Submodules: The Lone Rangers
What Are They?
Git Submodules are like those mysterious side characters in movies who have their own spin-offs.
They’re repositories nested within other repositories, maintaining their own histories and identities.
It’s like having a mini-me inside your main project. (geeksforgeeks.org)
Pros:
- Independent Versioning: Each submodule can point to a specific commit, allowing for controlled updates.
- Separation of Concerns: Keeps codebases modular, simplifying dependency management.
- Consistent Environment: Developers can easily obtain the state of the project as intended by the original contributor.
Cons:
- Complex Workflow: Requires separate commands for initialization and updates.
- Detached HEAD Issues: Can lead to confusion if not managed properly.
- Contributing Back Changes: More steps involved compared to direct pushes.
When to Use:
- When you need to keep the embedded repository’s commit history separate from the main repository.
- When you need to reference different versions of the embedded repository.
- When you don’t need to change the embedded repository frequently. (dev.devbf.com)
Git Subtrees: The Team Players
What Are They?
Git Subtrees are like the friendly neighborhood superheroes who integrate seamlessly into your project. They allow you to nest a repository inside another as a subdirectory, merging histories directly into the parent repository. (atlassian.com)
Pros:
- Simpler Workflow: Integrated into the main repository, no need for separate commands.
- Unified History: Combines commit histories, making it easier to track changes.
- No Detached HEAD Issues: Everything stays in sync.
Cons:
- Larger Repository Size: Includes the entire history of the subtree, which might increase the size.
- Potential for Mixing Code: Requires careful management to avoid mixing super and sub-project code in commits.
- Learning Curve: Requires learning a new merge strategy.
When to Use:
- When you want to share a set of files between different projects without maintaining a separate repository.
- When you need to update the embedded repository frequently.
- When you want a single, unified repository with a shared commit history. (dev.devbf.com)
Techniques for Git embedding another Git
Use a sparse checkout for the submodule
You can configure a sparse checkout for the submodule to only check out the specific subdirectory you want.
Steps:
Add the submodule as usual:
1
git submodule add <repository-url> <submodule-path>
Navigate to the submodule directory:
1
cd <submodule-path>
Enable sparse checkout:
1
git sparse-checkout init
Specify the subdirectory you want:
1
git sparse-checkout set <subdirectory-path>
Update the submodule:
1
git pull --depth=1
Use a custom branch or repository containing only the subdirectory
If you have control over the repository being used as a submodule, you can create a separate branch or fork containing just the subdirectory. Then, add that repository as the submodule.
Steps:
Clone the repository containing the desired subdirectory:
1
git clone <repository-url>
Remove all files except the desired subdirectory:
1 2
cd <repository-name> git filter-repo --path <subdirectory-path> --force
Push the filtered repository to a new remote:
1 2
git remote add origin <new-repo-url> git push -u origin main
Add this new repository as the submodule.
Use a script to pull and copy only the subdirectory
If you don’t want the entire repository as a submodule, you can write a script to pull the repository, copy only the subdirectory, and use it in your project.
Steps:
Write a script to clone the repository and copy the specific directory:
1 2 3 4
#!/bin/bash git clone --depth=1 <repository-url> temp-repo cp -r temp-repo/<subdirectory-path> ./desired-path rm -rf temp-repo
Execute this script when needed.
Which approach to choose?
- If you want the submodule to stay connected to the upstream repository and be updated easily, use sparse checkout.
- If you want a clean repository without unrelated files, filter the repository or create a custom branch/repo.
- If the submodule doesn’t need to be tied to Git history, use a script.
Key Ideas
Feature | Git Submodules | Git Subtrees |
---|---|---|
Integration | External repository as a subdirectory with separate history. (geeksforgeeks.org) | External repository merged into the main repository with unified history. (atlassian.com) |
Versioning | Independent versioning; each submodule can point to a specific commit. (geeksforgeeks.org) | Unified versioning; all changes are part of the main repository. (atlassian.com) |
Workflow Complexity | Requires separate commands for initialization and updates. (geeksforgeeks.org) | Simpler workflow; integrated into the main repository. (atlassian.com) |
Repository Size | Minimal impact; only references the submodule. (gitprotect.io) | Potentially larger; includes the entire history of the subtree. (gitprotect.io) |
Use Cases | When you need to keep the embedded repository’s commit history separate. (dev.devbf.com) | When you want a single, unified repository with a shared commit history. (dev.devbf.com) |
Related Links
- Git Submodule vs Subtree: Which Is Right for Your Project?
- Git Submodule vs Subtree: Which Should You Use and When?
- Git Subtree: Alternative to Git Submodule | Atlassian Git Tutorial
- Managing Git Projects: Git Subtree vs. Submodule
- Decoupling vs Simplicity: An In-Depth Comparison of Git Submodules vs Subtrees
Git doesn’t support using only a specific subdirectory from a repository as a submodule directly. When you add a submodule, it clones the entire repository, not just a part of it. However, there are a few workarounds to achieve a similar result: