Featured image of post Cucumber: The BDD Testing Framework Explained

Cucumber: The BDD Testing Framework Explained

Cucumber: The BDD Testing Framework Explained

Cucumber is like SpecFlow’s older, more experienced sibling.

It supports multiple programming languages, integrates with popular test automation tools, and makes behavior-driven development (BDD) even smoother.

History

Cucumber was first released in 2008 as a Ruby-based BDD tool. Its main goal? Make automated tests readable by humans while remaining executable by machines.

As BDD gained popularity, Cucumber expanded its horizons and now supports Java, JavaScript, Kotlin, Python, PHP, and more.

If SpecFlow is the C# world’s BDD champion, Cucumber is the go-to tool for everything else.

How Cucumber Works

Cucumber uses the Gherkin syntax, just like SpecFlow. If you missed it last time, Gherkin is a structured, plain-English way to write test cases.

Here’s an example login scenario written in Gherkin:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Feature: User Login

Scenario: Successful Login
    Given the user navigates to the login page
    And the user enters "admin" as the username
    And the user enters "password123" as the password
    When the user clicks the login button
    Then the user should see the dashboard

Step Definitions (Where the Magic Happens)

In Cucumber, step definitions are written in code to match Gherkin steps with actual test logic.

Here’s how that login scenario is implemented in Java using Cucumber:

 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
import io.cucumber.java.en.*;
import org.junit.Assert;

public class LoginSteps {
    private LoginPage loginPage = new LoginPage();

    @Given("the user navigates to the login page")
    public void navigateToLoginPage() {
        loginPage.open();
    }

    @Given("the user enters \"(.*)\" as the username")
    public void enterUsername(String username) {
        loginPage.enterUsername(username);
    }

    @Given("the user enters \"(.*)\" as the password")
    public void enterPassword(String password) {
        loginPage.enterPassword(password);
    }

    @When("the user clicks the login button")
    public void clickLogin() {
        loginPage.clickLogin();
    }

    @Then("the user should see the dashboard")
    public void verifyDashboard() {
        Assert.assertTrue(loginPage.isDashboardDisplayed());
    }
}

How Cucumber Compares to SpecFlow

FeatureSpecFlow (C#)Cucumber (Multi-language)
Language SupportC# onlyJava, JavaScript, Ruby, Python, PHP, Kotlin, etc.
Test RunnerNUnit, xUnitJUnit, TestNG, Mocha, RSpec, etc.
Gherkin Support
IDE SupportVisual StudioIntelliJ, Eclipse, VS Code, RubyMine
CommunityMicrosoft-centricHuge global community

Why Should You Care?

  1. Multi-language Support – Write tests in Java, JavaScript, Python, Ruby, etc.
  2. Easy Integration – Works seamlessly with Selenium, Appium, and other test frameworks.
  3. Readable Tests – Gherkin makes it easy for non-techies to read and contribute.
  4. BDD Best Practices – Encourages collaboration between developers, testers, and business analysts.
  5. Scalability – Supports large-scale test automation projects.

The Downsides (Because Nothing is Perfect)

  • Setup Complexity – Getting Cucumber running for the first time can be tricky.
  • Verbose Step Definitions – If not managed well, steps can become repetitive.
  • Performance Overhead – Can be slower than traditional unit tests due to its layered architecture.

Key Ideas

ConceptSummary
CucumberA BDD testing framework supporting multiple programming languages
GherkinA structured, plain-English language for writing test cases
Feature FilesContain test scenarios written in Gherkin syntax
Step DefinitionsCode implementations of Gherkin test steps
Cucumber vs SpecFlowSpecFlow is C#-only, while Cucumber supports multiple languages

References